The Rich Get Richer And The Poor Get Prison

4 . What does Rei valet say we should do5 . What do you think we should do In his book , The Rich Get Richer and the Poor Get prison Jeffrey Reiman argues that the twist justice body is in fact culp turn out , barely that it has little to do with justice . He believes that the twist justice system has been crafted , probably without intent , to maintain the armed forces position quo and protect the rights of those in world cause . Drawing from the system espoused by Martin Luther poof Jr . in his Letter from a Birmingham toss , Reiman argues that the system cannot promote justice because the laws be unsporting , the pursuit of them is unjust and the determination of guilt is unjust . In his garner , King visits on pot to rise up against unjust laws in the name of liberty and equality Reiman falls poor of this call to revolution , but he does argue that major changes contain to be made to the law and to society as a whole if there is going to be a near effort to reduce the crime rates in the fall in StatesReiman begins his argument by explaining the inequities in the carriage the law is be . Property crimes and face-to-face crime assimilate systematically been define as major offenses in the state of matter while another(prenominal) crimes which can cause the same detrimental do , or perhaps however greater ones , are considered administrative issues or accomplished law violations , not criminal . Because these violations are considered civil or at worst negligence , the issue of establishment is often greater and often falls to the mutual citizen kind of of investigative agencies . These crimes then largely go unpunished . let in for example a major collective employer who is discriminating against an employee . in that location is a federal (and usually state as f ountainhead ) agency to investigate the alle! gations , but the burthen of proof lies squarely on the shoulders of the dupe .

If the victim does not have provable proof that he was wronged by the corporation , the case give generally go nowhere . If he does have severalise , then an investigation by bureaucrats , not law enforcement entrust ensue and may income tax return years . In assembly line , if a man is mugged on the street and reports the crime , he has no burden of proof , no standard of evidence that he moldiness present . Reiman would argue that these cases have contrastive burdens of proof because of the disparity in the criminal justice systemThe rootage disparity comes in the creation of laws and defining what it is illegal . Reiman argues that the people in power , the affluent and their friends , make laws designed to cover them in power . It is why there is a differentiation between slack homicide and first class or even second degree murder . This is done to protect the laden . For example if a factory owner allows safety conditions to pretermit and an employee is killed because of it , he would believably be subjected to a civil typesetters case . A desirous prosecutor might be able to develop careless homicide charges...If you want to get a to the full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay